2009 Initiative Analysis: 2010 California Marriage Protection Act

For the reasons noted above, this measure would result in fewer marriages and, therefore, a decrease in the collection of marriage license fees by county clerk's offices. In most cases, this is unlikely to have a significant fiscal effect on county clerk's offices, as counties are authorized to adjust marriage license fees to cover their costs.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2009/090563.aspx

^[PDF] Hearing Concerning Propositions 30, 31, and 38

Cannot be predicted, but potentially signifi cant in some counties. Restricts Legislature’s Ability to Pass Certain Bills Potentially lower spending—or higher revenues—based on future actions of the Legislature.
https://lao.ca.gov/handouts/state_admin/2012/Propositions_30_31_38_Sept_24_12.pdf

The 2021-22 Budget: Overview of the Spending Plan (Final Version)

Oct 27, 2021 - CWDB = California Workforce Development Board; CDE = California Department of Education; COLA = cost ‑of ‑living adjustment; GF = General Fund; CDFA = California Department of Food and Agriculture; CDTFA = California Department of Tax and Fee Administration; CTC = Commission on Teacher Credentialing; DCC = Department of Cannabis Control; DFPI = Department of Financial Protection
https://lao.ca.gov/Publications/Report/4448/1

2012 Initiative Analysis: The Schools and Local Public Safety Protection Act of 2012 Version 3

Localities also have the option of imposing, with voter approval, add-on rates to raise revenues for cities, counties, or special districts. As a result, SUT rates in California differ by county and locality, with an average rate of about 8.1  percent.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2012/120208.aspx

^[PDF] 1950 Budget Analysis: Department of Natural Resources

In those acquisitions where it is anticipated that actual operation will be by one of the counties, an appreciable capital outlay expenditure must be made before these areas are leased to the counties.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis/1950/19_resources_1950.pdf

^[PDF] The California Craft Cannabis Initiative

The measure would result in reduced costs to the state and local governments by reducing the number of marijuana offenders incarcerated in state prison and county jail, as well as the number placed under community supervision (such as county probation).
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2015/150246.pdf

^[PDF] 1949 Budget Analysis: MISCElLANEOUS

The largest part of the amount refunded arose from charges by the Department of Mental Hygiene to the counties for institu- tional care of county inebriates and persons charged with crimes after the effective date of the repeal of the statute requiring such charges.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis/1949/32_misc_1949.pdf

LAO Publications

All Years2018201720162015201420132012201120102009200820072006200520042003200220012000199919981997199619951994199319921991199019891988198719861985198419831982198119801979197819771976197519741973197219711970196919681967196619651964196319621961196019591958195719561955195419531952195119501949194819471945All PublicationsHandoutOtherPostReportReport ERAF and the 1997-98 State Budget June 18, 1997 - The
https://lao.ca.gov/publications?page=191&year=0&publicationType=0

LAO Publications

All Years2018201720162015201420132012201120102009200820072006200520042003200220012000199919981997199619951994199319921991199019891988198719861985198419831982198119801979197819771976197519741973197219711970196919681967196619651964196319621961196019591958195719561955195419531952195119501949194819471945All PublicationsHandoutOtherPostReportReport ERAF and the 1997-98 State Budget June 18, 1997 - The
https://lao.ca.gov/Publications?page=191&year=0&publicationType=0

What Fiscal Incentive Do Cities Face?

13: Property Tax Allocation 14: Property Tax Allocation 15: (Untitled) 16: Summary of Local Fiscal Control 17: Second Crack: Not Conducive to Broad Economic Growth 18: Instead, Local Fiscal System Encourages Cities and Counties to 19: What Fiscal Incentive Do Cities Face?
https://lao.ca.gov/sections/local_govt/cracks_presentation/fslide19.html