^[PDF] Our Children, Our Future: Local Schools and Early Education Investment Act (Amndt.#1S)

Because of funding limitations, waiting lists for subsidized programs are common in most counties. As of June 2010, about 125,000 eligible children under the age of five were waiting for a slot in one of the state’s subsidized programs.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2011/110773.pdf

2011 Initiative Analysis: Our Children, Our Future: Local Schools and Early Education Investment Act (Amndt.#1S)

Because of funding limitations, waiting lists for subsidized programs are common in most counties. As of June 2010, about 125,000 eligible children under the age of five were waiting for a slot in one of the state ’s subsidized programs.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2011/110773.aspx

^[PDF] State Assistance to Businesses in Response to COVID-19

Under this program, the state provided a total of $50 million in grants to eligible microbusinesses distributed to each county according to its population. The maximum award for each microbusiness was $2,500.
https://lao.ca.gov/reports/2024/4824/State-Assistance-to-Businesses-COVID19-010424.pdf

^[PDF] LAO 1998 Perspectives and Issues: Perspectives on State Expenditures

For exam- ple, the budget includes a total of $293 million ($26 million in 1997-98 and $267 million in 1998-99) for county fiscal incentives. We believe it is rea- sonable to assume that the CalWORKs legislation intended that county fiscal incentives be provided to the counties even if the total budgeted expenditures exceed the amount needed.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_1998/pdfs_pandi98/part4_expenditures_pandi98.pdf

Cannabis Tax Revenue Update [EconTax Blog]

Jun 2, 2021 - Cannabis Tax Revenue Update [EconTax Blog] Seth Kerstein In November 2016, California voters approved Proposition 64 , which legalized the nonmedical use of cannabis. The state levies two excise taxes on cannabis: a retail excise tax and a cultivation tax.
https://lao.ca.gov/LAOEconTax/Article/Detail/661

2007 Initiative Analysis: California Flat Tax

Thus, the combined state-local SUT rate among counties varies from 7.25 percent to 8.75  percent, with a statewide weighted-average rate of 7.94 percent. Proposition 42 Funding Proposition 42, passed by the electorate in 2002, permanently directs to transportation purposes SUT revenues from gasoline sales, which previously had been deposited in the General Fund.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2007/070642.aspx

U.S. Retail Sales Update: October 2020 [EconTax Blog]

Nov 17, 2020 - U.S. retail sales grew modestly in October. Total sales January-October 2020 were just 0.1% below January-October 2019.
https://lao.ca.gov/LAOEconTax/Article/Detail/580

^[PDF] 1975 Budget Analysis: Health and Welfare

The other 95 percent of funds allocated to prime sponsors by the Department of Labor (DOL) is divided among the 35 (counties and cities) remaining prime sponsors within the state. EDD has made each county a program agent and allocated the funds to the counties on the basis of manpower plans submitted.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis/1975/12_health_welfare_1975.pdf

^[PDF] The enforcement of and sentencing for certain criminal offenses.

Approved by voters in 2004, MHSA placed a 1 percent tax on incomes over $1 million and dedicated the associated revenues of roughly $2 billion annually to mental health services. Up to 5 percent of this funding goes to the state to administer the MHSA.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2019/190617.pdf

^[PDF] Proposition 41: Public Aid and Medical Assistance Programs

THE REMAINING REDUCTIONS WOULD HAVE HAD TO BE ACHIEVED BY REDUCING EXPENDITURES FOR STATE AND COUNTY PERSONNEL EMPLOYED TO ADMINISTER THESE PROGRAMS AND OTHER OPERATING EXPENSES. FINALLY, THE REDUCTION OF FEDERAL EXPENDITURES IN CALIFORNIA THAT WOULD HAVE RESULTED FROM IMPLEMENTATION OF PROPOSITION 41 IN 1983 WOULD HAVE BROUGHT ABOUT, OVER TIME, A REDUCTION IN STATE AND LOCAL TAX REVENUES IN THE GENERAL MAGNITUDE OF $250 MILLION PER YEAR.
https://lao.ca.gov/reports/1984/proposition_41_public_aid_and_medical_assistance_program.pdf