^[PDF] Governor's Prison Overcrowding Package Is More Balanced But Too Big

State Prisons Overcrowded Population Compared to Permanent Capacity (December 31, 2006) Security Housing Type Inmatesa Permanent Capacityb Surplus/ Deficit(-) Men Level I 30,537 23,013 -7,524 Level II 42,359 35,122 -7,237 Level III 34,065 42,451 8,386 Level IV 26,895 20,571 -6,324 Reception center 24,413 20,063 -4,350 Specialc 3,070 3,927 857 Totals, Men (161,339) (145,147) (-16,192) Women 11,761
https://lao.ca.gov/handouts/crimjust/2007/Governors_Prison_04_12_07.pdf

^[PDF] Race to the Top: An Update and Key Issues for Phase 2

Open enrollment Students in the bottom 1,000 schools in the state may transfer to another district (Chapter 3). STEM accountability The CDE and SBE shall recommend ways to increase accountability in math and science. a Refl ects provisions contained in Chapter 2, unless otherwise noted. 3L E G I S L A T I V E A N A L Y S T ’ S O F F I C E May 12, 2010  California submitted a
https://lao.ca.gov/handouts/education/2010/Race_to_the_Top_An_Update_and_Key_Issues_for_Phase_2_51210.pdf

LAO 2008 Budget Analysis: Governor�s Infrastructure Bond Proposal

The Trial Court Facilities Act of 2002 (Chapter 1082, Statutes of 2002 [SB 1732, Escutia]) provided legal authority to transfer local court facilities to the state. The state will eventually have a substantial inventory of assets including 451 court facilities, 11 appellate court facilities, and 3 supreme court facilities.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_2008/cap_outlay/infra_anl08002.aspx

2007 Initiative Analysis: California Flat Tax

Increased transfers would occur from the General Fund to transportation-related funds per Proposition 42 of about $1 billion in 2008-09 and more than $2 billion per year annually thereafter. ·               Tax Agency Administrative Costs.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2007/070642.aspx

LAO 2009-10 Budget Analysis Series: In–Home Supportive Services (5180)

The original rationale for the SOC buyout program was that it allowed IHSS recipients to transfer from the Residual program to the other IHSS programs without increasing their SOC obligation, essentially holding them harmless.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_2009/ss/ss_anl09003004.aspx

LAO 2009-10 Budget Analysis Series: Prop 98 Education Programs: Executive Summary

In addition, districts would be able to transfer funds among categorical programs as well as from categorical programs to general purpose accounts. Although additional flexibility would benefit districts, we have concerns with the Governor ’s approach of merely disregarding —rather than reforming —the state ’s categorical system.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_2009/education/ed_anl09001.aspx

California's Fiscal Forecast 1997-98--Chapter 3

Additional local rates ranging from 1.25  percent to 2.5  percent are imposed by cities, counties, and transportation districts, bringing the combined state-local tax rate to between 7.25  percent and 8.5  percent, depending on the county involved.
https://lao.ca.gov/1997/112097_fiscal_outlook/1997_fiscal_outlook_chapter_3.html

^[PDF] 2000 Budget Perspectives and Issues: An Overview State Expenditures

The LPSF was established by Proposition 172 (November 1993), which made permanent a temporary half-cent increase in the state sales tax and dedi- cated the revenue to the LPSF for allocation by the Legislature to cities and counties.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_2000/2000_pandi/part4a/pandi_pt4a_2000.pdf

2005 Initiative Analysis: The Tax Reduction and Taxpayer Equity Act of 2005

Local property tax revenues are distributed to school districts, community colleges, cities, counties, and special districts based on statutory provisions. Local property tax rev enues allocated to school districts and community colleges count toward the Proposition  98 minimum funding guarantee.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050111.htm

^[PDF] The California Renewable Energy and Clean Alternative Fuel Act

In addition, the state collects an annual VLF on motor vehicles, the reve- nues of which are distributed to cities and counties. Currently, the VLF rate is equal to 0.65 percent of a motor vehicle’s depreciated purchase price.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2007/070979.pdf