^[PDF] The 2012-13 Budget: The 2011 Realignment of Adult Offenders—An Update

Counties would also be provided fiscal flexibility to transfer some of the funding—equal to an amount of up to 10 percent of the smaller of the two subaccounts—between these two particular subaccounts.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis/2012/crim_justice/2011-realignment-of-adult-offenders-022212.pdf

^[PDF] The 2012-13 Budget: Managing Ongoing Reductions to the Judicial Branch

For example, the transfers and loans from judicial branch special funds in 2011-12 lowered the balance in those funds, thereby reducing the amounts that would be available for additional transfers in 2012-13.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis/2012/crim_justice/managing-ongoing-reductions-041312.pdf

^[PDF] Unwinding Redevelopment

In addition, county auditor-controllers transferred half of total annual tax increment to RDAs in December or early January and the pass-through netting out provision What Is the Purpose? Chapter 5, Statutes of 2011 (ABX1 26, Blumenfield), allocates the property tax revenues of former redevelopment agencies (RDAs) to K-14 districts, cities, counties, and special districts.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis/2012/general_govt/unwinding-redevelopment-021712.pdf

^[PDF] The 2012-13 Budget: Strategies to Maintain California’s Park System

In contrast to closing a state park, transferring ownership of a park to a non-state agency releases the state from all financial responsibility and maintains public access to the park. However, given the financial constraints of local governments, it is uncertain if a significant number of cities and counties would be interested in taking ownership of a state park.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis/2012/resources/state-parks-030212.pdf

^[PDF] The 2013‑14 Budget: Analysis of Governor’s Proposition 39 Proposal

For a five‑year period (2013‑14 through 2017‑18), the proposition requires that half 2 Legislative Analyst’s Office www.lao.ca.gov 2013-14 B u d g e t of the annual revenue raised from the measure—up to $550 million—be transferred to a new Clean Energy Job Creation Fund to support projects intended to improve energy efficiency and expand the use of alternative energy.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis/2013/education/prop-39/prop-39-022213.pdf

^[PDF] The 2013-14 Budget: Proposition 98 Education Analysis

In 2004-05, for example, the state temporarily shifted roughly $1 billion in property tax revenues from schools and colleges to cities and counties as part of a complicated transfer associated with paying off the state’s Economic Recovery Bonds.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis/2013/education/prop-98/prop-98-022113.pdf

^[PDF] The 2013-14 Budget: Analysis of the Higher Education Budget

This cap also equates to about one extra year of coursework beyond that required for transfer or an associate degree. For CCC students who transfer to UC or CSU as juniors, the proposed cap is 150 percent in the first two years and 125 percent beginning in 2015‑16 of the additional units needed to meet the requirements for a bachelor’s degree.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis/2013/highered/higher-education-021213.pdf

Making Government Make Sense: A More Rational Structure for State and Local Government

Shift property tax allocations from schools to cities and counties to offset net state-local cost shifts. Eliminate Counter-Productive Fiscal Incentives Transfer 1 percent local sales and use tax to state level, offset with increased property tax allocations.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_1993/MGMS_reprint_02-93.html

^[PDF] LAO 1993 Budget Analysis: Making Government Make Sense

Property tax revenues now allocated to special districts would, in- stead, be entirely allocated to counties, or to cities in the case of city- dependent districts. These counties or cities would be responsible for funding them or taking over their operations.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_1993/MGMS_reprint_02-93.pdf

^[PDF] LAO 1994 Budget Perspectives and Issues: State Fiscal Picture

(These estimates differ from those printed in the Governor's Figure 3 Governor's Budget General Fund Condition 1993-94 and 1994-95 (Dollars in Millions) 1993-94 As Proposeda Percent Change Adjusted for Restructuringb Prior-year balance -$2,289 -$1,893 -$1,893 Revenues and transfers 39,743 41,334 4.0% 43,105 8.5% Total resources avail- able $37,454 $39,441 $41,212 Expenditures
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_1994/1994_pandi/pi94part1.pdf