Results


12,931 results

Sort by date / relevance

LAO 2004 Budget Analysis: Education Technology

However, since that time ma y be many years in the future, we recommend the state delay such investments and redirect the $21  million to other budget priorities.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_2004/education/ed_13_ed_tech_anl04.htm

LAO 2004 Budget Analysis: Mandates

The SDE also is required to audit a sample of district records each year. District claims for this mandate in 2001-02 totaled $55,000. This mandate overlaps with information obtained through another mandate —Physical Fitness testing, which requires schools to assess the physical fitness of students in three grades every two years.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_2004/education/ed_10_mandates_anl04.htm

[PDF] The 2015-16 Budget: CTE Incentive Grants for Secondary Schools

The 2015-16 Budget: CTE Incentive Grants for Secondary Schools Presented to: Assembly Budget Subcommittee No. 2 on Education Finance Hon. Kevin McCarty, Chair The 2015-16 Budget: CTE Incentive Grants for Secondary Schools L E G I S L A T I V E A N A L Y S T ’ S O F F I C E March 24, 2015 LAO 70 YEARS OF SERVICE 1L E G I S L A T I V E A N A L Y S T ’ S O F F I C E March 24, 2015 LAO 70 YEARS OF SERVICE CTE Industry Areas
https://lao.ca.gov/handouts/education/2015/CTE-Incentive-Grants-032415.pdf

[PDF] Impact of Federal Proposals on California

R"'ict I~W~~mS"\f"c:f"lt;:': April 25, 1995 Impact of Federal Proposals on California Presented To Joint Legislative Budget Committee By Hadley Johnson Mac Taylor LEGISLATIVE ANALYST'S OFFICE LAO "~ 50 years of sUlIice . r Total Federal Spending In California 1992-93 Compared With 1982-83 D Defense $150 • Nondefense 82-83 92-93 ~ Total federal spending in
https://lao.ca.gov/reports/1995/impact_of_federal_proposals_on_cal.pdf

1999-00 Perspectives and Issues: State Fiscal Picture

This proposed supplement of general purpose funding--which would continue in years after 1999-00--is intended to partl y compensate school districts for prior years when the state did not fully fund statutory COLAs.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_1999/1999_pandi/part1/part1_pandi99.html

[PDF] Major Features of the 1996 California Budget Budget Brief

“Settle-Up”—1995-96 and Prior Years. Provides overall K-12 funding of $4,625 per pupil for 1995-96, or $190 more per pupil than anticipated in the 1995 Budget Act. Figure 1 summarizes for 1995-96 and 1996-97 the effect of the budget package on K-12 schools, community col- leges, and other specified agencies.
https://lao.ca.gov/1996/071096_bud_major_features/pb71096.pdf

LAO 2004 Budget Analysis: K-12 Introduction

For example, programs like home-to-school transportation, year-round schools, gifted and talented education, dropout prevention, and tenth grade co unseling will not receive growth or COLAs in 2004-05.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_2004/education/ed_03_k12intro_anl04.htm

[PDF] The 2022-23 Budget: California State University

The language also requires CSU to submit a report on foster youth services and outcomes every two years beginning March 31, 2024. Assessment Additional Support for Foster Youth Could Be Warranted. Providing additional support targeted for foster youth could help address their academic disparities as well as their higher rates of food and housing insecurity.
https://lao.ca.gov/reports/2022/4537/CSU-021522.pdf

1998-99 Perspectives and Issues: Perspectives on State Expenditures Part III

Research Does Not Support Longer School Year . The budget proposes to spend $400  million ($350  million in new funds) to extend the school year to 180 days by (1)  eliminating current statutory provisions that permit schools to use up to 8 days of the existing 180-day school
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_1998/p_and_i_1998/part4_expenditures3_pandi98.html

Overview of the 2006-07 May Revision

This is because the May Revision includes a proposed settlement to a court case involving Proposition 98 school funding. Under this agreement, the state would provide an additiona l $2.9 billion in school funding over a seven-year period.
https://lao.ca.gov/2006/may_revise/may_revise_051506.html