2001 Initiative Analysis: Accuracy in Presidential Voting Act of 2002

County Costs. Counties would also incur additional staff costs to fulfill requests for accelerated certifications of the vote count. These statewide costs are unknown but could range from hundre ds of thousands to several millions of dollars every four years depending on the number and size of counties required to participate in an accelerated certification.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2001/010978_INT.htm

^[PDF] "Accuracy in Presidential Voting Act of 2002"

County Costs. Counties would also incur additional staff costs to fulfill requests for accelerated certifications of the vote count. These statewide costs are unknown but could range from hundreds of thousands to several millions of dollars every four years depending on the number and size of counties required to participate in an accelerated certification.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2001/010978_INT.pdf

2001 Initiative Analysis: Traffic Congestion Relief and Safe School Buses Act (Version 1)

Key Provisions The measure sets up a new Traffic Congestion Relief and Safe School Bus Trust Fund (TCRSSBTF) and transfers from the state General Fund into the new fund 30  percent of the sales tax revenue from the lease and sale of new and used motor vehicles.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2001/011017_INT.htm

^[PDF] Use of sales tax revenues derived from the lease and sale of motor vehicles for transportation purposes

Use of sales tax revenues derived from the lease and sale of motor vehicles for transportation purposes SENATE ASSEMBLY DICK ACKERMAN ROY ASHBURN DEDE ALPERT PATRICIA C. BATES JIM BATTIN JACKIE GOLDBERG K.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2001/011017_INT.pdf

2001 Initiative Analysis: Traffic Congestion Relief and Safe School Buses Act (Version 2)

Key Provisions The measure sets up a new Traffic Congestion Relief and Safe School Bus Trust Fund (TCRSSBTF) and transfers from the General Fund into the new fund the sales tax revenue from the s ale of new passenger vehicles, excluding sport utility vehicles (SUVs) and housecars (that is, motor homes).
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2001/011018_INT.htm

2001 Initiative Analysis: Gaming Control Act

In addition, the measure imposes a gross revenue gaming tax of up to 10  percent of the gross revenue from gaming activities in licensed facilities. Twenty-five percent of the tax revenue would be deposited in the state’s General Fund; 25  percent would be allocated to the county where the revenue is generated; and 50  percent to the local
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2001/011027_INT.htm

^[PDF] Gaming Control Act, Amendment No. 3-S

In addition, the measure imposes a gross revenue gaming tax of up to 10 percent of the gross revenue from gaming activities in licensed facilities. Twenty-five percent of the tax revenue would be deposited in the state’s General Fund; 25 percent would be allocated to the county where the revenue is generated; and 50 percent to the local
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2001/011027_INT.pdf

2001 Initiative Analysis: Let the Voters Decide

This measure would probably not result in any additional costs to the state or counties.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2001/011028_INT.htm

^[PDF] Let the Voters Decide, Amendment No. 1-S

This measure would probably not result in any additional costs to the state or counties. Sincerely, _____________________________ Elizabeth Hill Legislative Analyst _____________________________ B. Timothy Gage Director of Finance
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2001/011028_INT.pdf

2001 Initiative Analysis: Election Day Voter Registration

The proposed initiative establishes an annual state allocation of $6  million to counties for these purposes, so the initiative will result in no net costs to counties. Summary of Fiscal Effects This measure would result in about $6  million in state costs and no net costs to counties.  
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2001/011031_INT.htm