Results


4,820 results

Sort by date / relevance

[PDF] High Priority Projects in California

High Priority Projects in California TEA 21 High Priority Projects in California 1998 Through 2004 (Dollars in Millions) Counties Description Amount Project Costs Percent of Project Funded Solano - Contra Costa -Alameda- Santa Clara Construct capital improvements along I-680 corridor $2.3 $6.3 36% Butte / Yuba Improve SR 70 from Marysville Bypass to Oroville Freeway 6.3 172.0 4 San Francisco -
https://lao.ca.gov/1998/082698_tea_21/isteafig11.pdf

California Spending Plan, Chapter 3

  $9.2 million to compensate certain claimants, including the City of Portola and Plumas County, with respect to the Department of Fish and Game's northern pike eradication project at Lake Davis.  
https://lao.ca.gov/1998/1098_spending_plan/1098_spending_plan_chapter_3.html

Overhauling the State's Infrastructure

Currently, the state pays for state-owned infrastructure (suc h as universities, prisons, and state parks), but has also provided substantial infrastructure funding for local government (school districts, cities, counties, and special distric ts).
https://lao.ca.gov/1998/122198_infrastructure/1298_state_infrastructure.html

LAO Recommended Legislation, 1998: Resources

LAO Recommended Legislation, 1998: Resources Transfer Beverage Container Recycling Program Recommendation Authorize the transfer of the Department of Conservation's (DOC's) beverage container recycling program to the Integrated Waste Management Board (IWMB).
https://lao.ca.gov/1998/1298_rec_legislation/1298_legislation_resources.html

[PDF] 1998 Cal Facts: California's Fiscal Structure

Revenues go to cities, counties and special districts. Vehicle License Fees 1.5% Tax is applied to depreciated purchase price. It is collected by the state and distributed to cities and counties. Other Local Varies by jurisdiction Types of taxes and rates vary by jurisdiction.
https://lao.ca.gov/1998/1998_calfacts/1998_calfacts_fiscal_structure.pdf

[PDF] Special Education: Nonpublic School and Nonpublic Agency Study Final Report

Further complications arise when an NPS and LCI have common ownership. If LCI owners or managers urge placement in their own NPS, does this constitute a Chapter 2. How NPS and NPA Placements Work American Institutes for Research American Institutes for Research 24 conflict of interest for them and possibly operate against the best interests of the child?
https://lao.ca.gov/1998/special_education_0998/special_ed_nonpublic_by_air.pdf

What Will It Mean for California? The Tobacco Settlement

The remaining 10 percent, or $1.25 billion, will be split equally among four specified cities--Los Angeles, San Diego, San Francisco, and San Jose. The MOU limits the recovery to t hese cities who could have filed an independent lawsuit pursuant to a specific provision of the Business and Professions Code.
https://lao.ca.gov/1999/011499_tobacco_settlement.html

[PDF] A Special Session Guide T To

The state would, over time, transfer control over major decisions to school boards. A major state presence, however, would be needed to correct problems over which districts have little incentive or ability to resolve.
https://lao.ca.gov/1999/0199_k-12_reform/0199_k-12_reform.pdf

A Special Session Guide to K-12 Reform

The state would, over time, transfer control over major decisions to school boards. A major state presence, however, would be needed to correct problems over which districts have little incentive or ability to resolve.
https://lao.ca.gov/1999/0199_k-12_reform4.html

[PDF] A K-12 Master Plan

(This is currently the relation- ship, for instance, that cities and counties have with the retirement system.) Few Local Revenue Options Available Local-option revenues are a critical part of any plan to empower districts.
https://lao.ca.gov/1999/0599_k-12_master_plan.pdf