Publication Date

All

Current year

Past 5 years

 


 

Subject Area
Ballot (19)
See all

Results in Ballot


19 results

Sort by date / relevance

Property tax assessment. [Ballot]

Oct 15, 2021 - Instead, the state General Fund would transfer money to schools and local gov ernments to cover their losses from the other recent changes. Fiscal Effects Increased State Costs to Cover Other Property Tax Revenue Losses.
https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis/Initiative/2021-015

Oversight of certain public benefit artificial intelligence (AI) companies. [Ballot]

Jan 20, 2026 - The measure would have the following major fiscal effects: Increased state costs that would likely be in the tens of millions of dollars annually to establish and operate a new regulatory commission overseeing certain public benefit AI com panies.
https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis/Initiative/2025-033

The California Craft Cannabis Initiative [Ballot]

Jun 9, 2015 - DOJ exercises its discretion to enforce federal prohibitions on marijuana activities otherwise permitted by this measure and (2) how, and to what extent, state and local gov ernments choose to regulate and tax the commercial production and sale of marijuana.
https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis/Initiative/2015-017

Managed care organization tax. [Ballot]

Oct 27, 2023 - The federal gov ernment has not yet indicated whether it will approve the tax. If the federal government does not approve the tax, the DHCS would need to restructure the tax and resubmit it to the federal government, likely affecting how much money the tax raises.
https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis/Initiative/2023-024

Chronic dialysis clinics. [Ballot]

Oct 14, 2021 - Most CDCs operate under a gov erning entity that owns/operates multiple CDCs such that the governing entity could spread costs across multiple locations. Governing entities might respond in one or more of the f ollowing ways: Negotiate Increased Rates With Payers.
https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis/Initiative/2021-013

Related to the cultivation, use, possession, and sale of marijuana (Amendment #1). [Ballot]

Oct 9, 2015 - In addition, the measure would result in costs for the state and local gov ernments to regulate the commercial production and sale of marijuana. These costs would vary depending on how, and to what extent, the state and local governments choose to adopt and enforce such regulations but could amount to several tens of millions of dollars annually, primarily borne by local governments.
https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis/Initiative/2015-049

Constitutional initiative related to medical marijuana. [Ballot]

Sep 8, 2015 - Impedes a patient 's ability to obtain, transport, or cultivate marijuana, so long as (1)  the method of obtaining, cultivating, or transporting marijuana is consistent with the business practices and/or cultivation practices used for other non-prohibited flora in the l aw ’s jurisdiction, and (2) no medical marijuana business or cultivation activities occur within 600  feet of a K-12 school, unless approved by local authorities.
https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis/Initiative/2015-044

Proposition 16 [Ballot]

Nov 3, 2020 - State law also has a number of antidiscrimination provisions that are similar to those in federal l aw. Policies and Programs Created or Modified After Proposition  209. After voters approved Proposition  209, some public entities in California created or modified policies and programs to instead consider characteristics not banned by Proposition  209.
https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis/Proposition?number=16&year=2020

Retirement benefits for state and local governmental employees in California (Amendment No. 1). [Ballot]

Nov 24, 2015 - Gov ernmental employers would be able to provide matching contributions to these types of accounts; however, such matches could not exceed the contributions made by employees (unless a pproved by voters).
https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis/Initiative/2015-076

Retirement benefits for state and local governmental employees in California (Amendment No.1). [Ballot]

Nov 24, 2015 - Gov ernmental employers would be able to provide matching contributions to these types of accounts up to the limits established by the measure; however, such matches could not exceed t he contributions made by employees (unless approved by voters).
https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis/Initiative/2015-077