LAO Analysis of the 1999-00 Budget Bill Capital Outlay Crosscutting Issues

Linking eligibility for infrastructure funds to meeting performance criteria. Utilization of the State Infrastructure Bank to assist in financing state and local infrastructure. Dedication by both state and local governments of a set amount of funds for pay-as-you-go financing.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_1999/cap_outlay/cap_outlay_crosscutting_anl99.html

2013 Initiative Analysis:California Personal Privacy Act (Amendment #1-S)

Specifically, the measure states that confidential personal information is information provided by a person to a public agency, private entity, or individual to be used for a governmental or commercial purpose and that can be linked to that person.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2013/130462.aspx

2009 Initiative Analysis: California Freedom From Slavery Act

This change would occur because the Constitution generally links the minimum funding amount to overall state revenues—and the measure’s exemptions would reduce state revenues. Summary of Fiscal Effect The measure would have the following major fiscal effects: Annual state revenue  losses of $15  billion or more due to new exemptions on personal income and estate taxation.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2009/090629.aspx

2005 Initiative Analysis: The Safe and Affordable Prescription Drug Act

Unknown costs and savings as a result of provisions linking drug prices for the new drug discount program to Medi-Cal prices, including the potential effect on the state’s rece ipt of supplemental rebates; unknown savings on state and county health program costs due to the availability of drug discounts; and unknown costs and offsetting revenues fro m the anti-profiteering provisions.  
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050078.htm

^[PDF] The Safe and Affordable Prescription Drug Act

Unknown costs and savings as a result of provisions linking drug prices for the new drug discount program to Medi-Cal prices, including the potential effect on the state’s receipt of supplemental rebates; unknown savings on state and county health program costs due to the availability of drug discounts; and unknown costs and offsetting revenues from the anti- profiteering provisions.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050078.pdf

2005 Initiative Analysis: Cheaper Prescription Drugs for California Act

Unknown costs and savings as a result of provisions linking drug prices for the new drug discount program to Medi-Cal prices, including the potential effect on the state’s rece ipt of supplemental rebates; unknown savings on state and county health program costs due to the availability of drug discounts; and unknown costs and offsetting revenues fro m the anti-profiteering provisions.  
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050092.htm

^[PDF] Cheaper Prescription Drugs for California Act

Unknown costs and savings as a result of provisions linking drug prices for the new drug discount program to Medi-Cal prices, including the potential effect on the state’s receipt of supplemental rebates; unknown savings on state and county health program costs due to the availability of drug discounts; and unknown costs and offsetting revenues from the anti- profiteering provisions.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050092.pdf

^[PDF] Overview of California Local Government

If the costs of closely linked programs are shared, the cost sharing arrangements should be similar across programs.  Increases accountability to the public.  Promotes effi ciency in expenditures and discourages inappropriate cost shifting.
https://lao.ca.gov/handouts/Conf_Comm/2010/Overview_CA_Local_Gov_6_15_10.pdf

LAO 2007 Budget Analysis: State Water Resources Control Board (3940)

Moreover, the board has a number of new IT projects under development, each of which is specifically designed to link with CIWQS and will generally require the regional boards to change the way they conduct data entry.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_2007/resources/res_15_3940_anl07.aspx

LAO 2008 Budget Analysis: Commission on State Mandates (8885)

Our review finds no link between the funding provided under Chapter 752 and programs that encourage animal adoption. Specifically, under the mandate ’s reimbursement methodology, shelters do not get more state funds if more households adopt animals.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_2008/general_govt/gen_anl08018.aspx