^[PDF] Child and Youth Services Review, Volume 33, Issue 9, pages

Child and Youth Services Review, Volume 33, Issue 9, pages 1630-1637, September 2011 . https://doi. org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2011.04.005 Drake, Brett et al . “Racial/Ethnic Differences in Child Protective Services Reporting, Substantiation and Placement, With Comparison to Non-CPS Risks and Outcomes: 2005-2019,” Child Maltreatment, Volume 28, Issue 4, pages
https://lao.ca.gov/reports/2024/4897/disproportionalities-disparities-child-welfare-042424.pdf

^[PDF] Overview of Migrant Education Program

California Implements Program Through Regional Model 3L E G I S L A T I V E A N A L Y S T ’ S O F F I C E May 03, 2012 California Implements Program Through Regional Model (Continued) Migrant Education Program (MEP) Centers Bold font indicates the 14 county offices of education responsible for delivering regional MEP services (indicated by the shaded regions).
https://lao.ca.gov/handouts/education/2012/Overview_of_Migrant_Education_Program_050312.pdf

California’s Child Welfare System: Addressing Disproportionalities and Disparities

Apr 24, 2024 - Until 2011 ‑12, the state General Fund and counties shared significant portions of the nonfederal costs of administering child welfare programs. In 2011, the state enacted legislation and the voters adopted constitutional amendments (in 2012) known as 2011 realignment, which gave counties fiscal responsibility for child welfare.
https://lao.ca.gov/Publications/Report/4897

2001 Budget Analysis:New Tobacco Settlement Fund

The 2001-02 budget proposes to allocate $106 million (mostly Proposition 99 funds ) to continue antitobacco and smoking prevention programs, including $20 million in new spending from the TSF. If these programs and other measures continue to be effective in redu cing smoking, tobacco settlement payments to the state could go even lower because its payments are linked to the volume of tobacco sales.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_2001/health_ss/hss_5_CC_TSF.htm

^[PDF] Overview of SSI/SSP Cash Grants—2000-01 to 2015-16

State Has Made Changes to SSI/SSP Grants to Achieve Budgetary Savings Since 2000-01 (Continued) State-Funded COLAs Since 2000-01 Year Percentage 2000-01 (January) 2.96% 2001-02 (January) 5.31 2002-03 (June) 3.74 2003-04 — 2004-05 (April) 2.75 2005-06 — 2006-07 — 2007-08 — 2008-09 — 2009-10 — 2010-11 — 2011-12 — 2012-13 — 2013-14 — 2014-15 —
https://lao.ca.gov/handouts/socservices/2015/Overview-of-SSI-SSP-Cash-Grants-2000-01-to-2015-16.pdf

^[PDF] The Budget Act and Related Legislation California Spending Plan 2002-03

General Fund support for special mental health services provided under the Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnosis and Treatment (EPSDT) program The 2002-03 Budget Package 49 (including therapeutic behavioral services) would increase by about $44 mil- lion.
https://lao.ca.gov/2002/spend_plan_02/0902_spend_plan.pdf

LAO 2004 Budget Analysis: Department of Developmental Services

Some rates are based on historical cost data while others are tied to what other similar vendors are paid, or the rates paid under the state's Medi-Cal health program for the poor, or what the public would pay for the same services.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_2004/health_ss/hss_13_4300_anl04.htm

The 2025-26 Budget: Educator Workforce

Mar 7, 2025 - On the other hand, directing more funding for math coaches would help the state begin to establish additional support for math instruction, similar to what the state has done in literacy over the past several years.
https://lao.ca.gov/Publications/Report/5012

^[PDF] California's Fiscal Outlook: LAO Projections 2001-02 Through 2006-07

What is particularly disturbing is that most of the weakness so far has been related to economic activity prior to Septem- ber 11, and thus, does not reflect the full effects of the slowdown in sales and income that occurred fol- lowing the terrorist attacks.
https://lao.ca.gov/2001/fisc_outlook/fiscal_outlook_2001.pdf

California Spending Plan 2002: Chapter 1

The budgetary impact of these trends is depicted in Figure  1 (see page 2), which shows what revenues and expenditures would have been in 2000-01 through 2002-03 had there been no budget-balancing actions taken following the 2001-02 budg et's enactment.
https://lao.ca.gov/2002/spend_plan_02/0902_spend_plan_chap_1.html