^[PDF] Figure 5_2016-17 Proposition 98 Changes.indd

Figure 5_2016-17 Proposition 98 Changes.indd 2016-17 Proposition 98 Changes (In Millions) Revised 2015-16 Proposition 98 Spending $69,175 Technical Adjustments Remove prior-year one-time payments -$1,446 Make other adjustments -115 Adjust categorical programs for changes in attendance -16 Make LCFF adjustments 101 Revise estimate of energy effi ciency funds 58 Annualize funding
https://lao.ca.gov/reports/2016/3326/5.pdf

^[PDF] Overview of Reserves and Debt and Liability Payments

(In Millions) Governor Senate Assembly Retirement Liabilities (State) CalPERSa $3,000 $1,103 $600 CalSTRS 1,117 1,117 — Retiree health 260 260 260 Subtotals ($4,377) ($2,480) ($860) Retirement Liabilities (Universities and School Districts) CalSTRS $2,300 $2,300 $2,300 CalPERS — — 1,150 UC retirement program 25 25 25 Subtotals
https://lao.ca.gov/handouts/Conf_Comm/2019/Reserves-Debt-Liability-053019.pdf

LAO Analysis of the 1997-98 Budget BillK-12 Education, Budget Issues, Part II

Similar to the schools that implemented in 1996-97, districts that were planning to begin schools in 1997-98 did not expect to reach the district caps during the first year of operation. Reduce Community School Funding.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_1997/k12_ed_depts2-b_anal97.html

^[PDF] LAO 1998 Budget Analysis: K-12 Education Chapter

These programs received half-year funding in the current year. • $25 million in half-year funding for expanding the state preschool program. • $10 million in half-year funding for expanding infant and toddler programs. • $14.6 million for a cost-of-living adjustment for child development programs.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_1998/pdfs_anl98/k12_ed_anl98.pdf

LAO Analysis of the 1998-99 Budget Bill Higher Education Crosscutting Issues

By contrast, the rate for those 25 years old and older fell from 5.4 to 4.2  percent over this same period. Because there are almost seven times as many adults 25 years old or older than there are in the 18 to 24 year old group, and because the percentage of older adults has increased significantly over the
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_1998/higher_ed_crosscutting_anl98.html

The 2022-23 California Spending Plan: The State Appropriations Limit

Sep 30, 2022 - Districts currently set aside approximately $2.2  billion per year related to this requirement. These funds meet the definition of capital outlay for SAL purposes, and so the spending plan adopts a plan to require school districts to exclude this spending from their limits.
https://lao.ca.gov/Publications/Report/4631

^[PDF] The 2023-24 Budget: Department of Water Resources

Funding would be available for expenditure until June 30, 2028. • Preparation of Next Iteration of the CVFPP ($4.4 Million in 2023-24; $36.9 Million Total Over Four Years). The Governor proposes providing $4.4 million in 2023-24, $11 million in 2024-25, $11.5 million in 2025-26, and $10 million in 2026-27 to prepare the next version of the CVFPP, which is due in 2027.
https://lao.ca.gov/reports/2023/4725/DWR-030223.pdf

The 2020-21 Budget: Transportation

Feb 10, 2020 - Governor’s Proposal The Governor proposes an increase of $31. 8  m illion in 2020 ‑21 (growing to $43. 4  m illion in 2024 ‑25 and ongoing) from the SHA to augment funding for the Litter Abatement Program.
https://lao.ca.gov/Publications/Report/4149

^[PDF] LAO 2000 Budget Analysis: Education Chapter

As Figure 1 (see next page) shows, the 2000-01 budget proposal pro- vides a total of $25 billion from all sources for higher education. This amount is $1.2 billion, or 5.2 percent, more than estimated expenditures in the current year.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_2000/education/ed_anl00.pdf

^[PDF] Felony sentencing.

The board generally considers the release of third strikers after they serve the minimum number of years required by their sentences (less any sentencing credits). For example, BPH would consider the release of a third striker sentenced to 25-years-to-life with 5 years of sentencing credits after the person served 20 years in prison.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2021/210570.pdf