Highlights of the 2000-01 Analysis and P&I

The budget proposes "use-it-or-lose-it" provisions for two types of local transportation funds--federal transportation funds and gas tax revenues. We conclude that the pr oposals are unwarranted and recommend against them. ( Analysis , page A-22 .)
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_2000/highlights_00-01_analysis.html

2000 Budget Analysis: Transportation Overview

In order to provide additional state funds for highway and mass transportation programs, the legislation increased the tax on motor vehicle fuel (gaso line and diesel) and truck weight fees as well as authorized specific bond measures.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_2000/transportation/tran_1_ov_anl00.htm

2001 Budget Analysis: P&I, Part 4a

As discussed in "Part III" of this volume, three taxes are projected to account for 95 percent of the total General Fund rev enues in the budget year. These taxes are the state's personal income tax, sales and use tax (SUT), and bank and corporation tax.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_2001/2001_pandi/pi_part_4a_anl01.html

2001 Budget Analysis: Capital Outlay, Department of Motor Vehicles (2740)

Of this amount, $600,000 is proposed from the State Highway Account of the State Transportation Fund (STF), $5 .5 million from the STF Motor Vehicle Account, and $4 million from the Motor Vehicle License Fee Account of the Transportation Tax Fund.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_2001/cap_outlay/co_11_2740.htm

2001 Budget Analysis: Capital Outlay, Department of General Services

The department has since determined that the tax-exempt status of the lease-payment bonds may be jeopardized because the project parking garage may be used for private purp oses after normal business hours and such use could result in the project exceeding the amount of private use of the facilities permitted by Internal Revenue Service regulations.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_2001/cap_outlay/co_8_1760.htm

2001 Budget Analysis: Overview

Test 1 —Percent of General Fund Revenues Approximately 34.5 percent of General Fund plus local property taxes .   Requires that K-12 schools and the California Community Colleges (CCC) receive at least the same share of state General Fund taxes as in 1986-87.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_2001/education/ed_01_ov_anl01.htm

2001 Budget Analysis:K-14 Education Priorities Proposition 98

By setting his appropriations total at Proposition 98's "test 2" amount —a combined total of $46.4 billion from the General Fund and local property tax allocations to school and community college districts —the Governor's budget not only meets COLA, enrollment growth and annualization needs, but provides resources for further K-14 initiatives.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_2001/education/ed_02_cc_priorities_anl01.htm

2001 Budget Analysis: K-12 Ed Introduction

Proposition 39 lowers vote requirement for K-14 facility bonds financed by local property taxes. Enrollment Trends Enrollment growth significantly shapes the Legislature's annual K-12 budget and policy decisions.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_2001/education/ed_06_k-12_intro_anl01.htm

2001 Budget Analysis: Discretionary Funding

When instituted in 1972, the revenue limit was calculated to be equal to the pe r-student amount of general purpose student aid and local property taxes that a district received in the 1972-73 fiscal year.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_2001/education/ed_07_Discretionary_anl01.htm

2001 Budget Analysis: Special Education

Increases in federal funds of $12.7 million offset the General Fund amounts needed for equalization and the incidence multiplier, while local property tax increases of $22 million also partially offset needed General Fund amounts.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_2001/education/ed_16_Special_Ed_anl01.htm