^[PDF] Cultivation, use, possession, and sale of marijuana (Amendment #1).

The measure states that the state excise tax shall be the only state tax applied specifically to the sale of marijuana. The measure also authorizes cities and counties to place additional taxes on marijuana.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2015/150596.pdf

The 2017-18 Budget: Analysis of the Medi-Cal Budget

Mar 9, 2017 - The three major sources of higher special fund spending in Medi ‑Cal in 2017 ‑18 are (1)  Proposition  56 tobacco excise tax revenues dedicated to Medi ‑Cal, (2)  managed care organization tax revenues, and (3)  hospital quality assurance fee revenues.
https://lao.ca.gov/Publications/Report/3612

^[PDF] The 2008-09 Budget: Perspectives and Issues

Counties would have broad authority to use these re- sources to reduce recidivism and improve public safety. Funding for parole realignment would come from a reallocation of: waste and water enterprise special district property taxes, city Proposition 172 sales taxes, and vehicle license fees retained by the Department of Motor Vehicles for administrative purposes.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_2008/2008_pandi/pandi_08.pdf

The 2023-24 California Spending Plan: Housing and Homelessness [Publication Details]

Oct 19, 2023 - The 2023-24 budget provides $3.3 billion for various housing and homelessness programs within the Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD), the California Interagency Council on Homelessness (CalICH), and the California Tax Credit Allocation Committee.
https://lao.ca.gov/Publications/Detail/4808

2009 Initiative Analysis: The Local Voter Control & Government Accountability Act

While some of the failed tax measures that earned more than 55  percent approval involved small sums, some of them were very large. For example, in 2004, the Los Angeles County half-cent sales tax failed because it received approval by only 60  percent of local voters.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2009/090644.aspx

Analysis of the 1995-96 Budget Bill: The Governor's 1995-96 State-County Realignment Proposal

Increased Sales Tax Allocations. The proposal would increase allocations of state sales taxes to the counties. This would be accomplished by earmarking a portion (.2215 cent) of the state's sales tax to pay for t he increased county costs of the foster care, CWS, adoptions, and child abuse prevention programs.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_1995/pt5-b.html

1995 September California Update

Figure 2 summarizes the major fiscal effects of the proposals on state/county funds. The net effect on state/county funds depends on several variables, the most significant being: Whether the state chooses to backfill for lost federal fund in order to maintain current service levels.
https://lao.ca.gov/1995/cal_update/cup995.html

^[PDF] 2000 Cal Facts: STATE–LOCAL FINANCES

Local Sales and Use 1.25% to 2.5% Collected with state sales and use tax. Revenues go to cities, counties, and special districts. Vehicle License Fee 0.65% Tax is applied to depreciated purchase price.
https://lao.ca.gov/2000/calfacts/2000_calfacts_state-local.pdf

^[PDF] Local rent control laws.

If cities or counties create new rent control laws or expand existing ones, local rent boards would have increased costs. For communities where rent control laws expand automatically, costs also could increase.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2022/220574.pdf

^[PDF] Overview of the May Revision 1993-94

The most problematic part of the budget plan is the proposed $2.6 billion property tax shift from local governments to schools. The Adminis- tration proposes that the counties offset a portion of their $2.1 billion loss by increasing local sales taxes, obtaining relief from state-mandated programs requirements, and using transferred special district property tax revenues.
https://lao.ca.gov/1993/Overview_May_Revision_176_0593.pdf