October 2, 2018
The spending plan provides $23.2 billion from all fund sources for transportation programs. As shown in Figure 25, this is a net increase of $4.7 billion, or 25 percent, when compared to the revised level of spending in 2017‑18. This largely reflects increased spending resulting from the recent transportation funding package contained in Chapter 5 of 2017 (SB 1, Beall). The spending plan also includes other augmentations for the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), the California Highway Patrol (CHP), and the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV).
Figure 25
Transportation Program Expendituresa
(Dollars in Millions)
Program/Department |
2016‑17 |
2017‑18 |
2018‑19 |
Change From 2017‑18 |
|
Amount |
Percent |
||||
Department of Transportation |
$9,151 |
$11,417 |
$14,218 |
$2,802 |
25% |
California Highway Patrol |
2,344 |
2,416 |
2,601 |
185 |
8 |
Shared revenues (local streets/roads) |
1,277 |
1,882 |
2,587 |
705 |
37 |
Department of Motor Vehicles |
1,059 |
1,124 |
1,184 |
60 |
5 |
High‑Speed Rail Authority |
733 |
305 |
1,177 |
872 |
286 |
State transit assistance |
339 |
726 |
983 |
257 |
35 |
Other transportation programsb |
334 |
649 |
428 |
‑221 |
‑34 |
Totals |
$15,238 |
$18,518 |
$23,179 |
$4,661 |
25% |
aIncludes state General Fund, state special funds, state bond funds, federal funds, and reimbursements. bIncludes California State Transportation Agency, California Transportation Commission, and Board of Pilot Commissioners. |
Senate Bill 1 increased fuel taxes and vehicle charges to support existing and new transportation programs. It also repays monies loaned in the past to the General Fund from various transportation accounts. In total, the spending plan assumes SB 1 provides $4.6 billion in 2018‑19—a $1.8 billion (62 percent) increase from the revised level of spending in 2017‑18. (The main reason for the year‑to‑year increase is that the increased taxes and charges authorized by SB 1 were in effect for only part of 2017‑18.) The $4.6 billion in spending includes:
The budget package also amends SB 1 to allow local governments to fund projects upfront and later reimburse themselves with funds they receive in future years through SB 1.
The budget plan for Caltrans includes total expenditures of $14.2 billion from all fund sources, an increase of $2.8 billion (or 25 percent) from the revised 2017‑18 level of expenditures. The increase from 2017‑18 to 2018‑19 primarily reflects new funding provided from SB 1 for highway maintenance and rehabilitation. As discussed below, the budget also augments Caltrans’ capital outlay support program, provides increases for Caltrans’ compensation costs and various other purposes, and places a limit on Caltrans’ indirect cost recovery charges for certain local governments.
Highway Maintenance and Rehabilitation. The budget increases highway maintenance spending from the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA) established by SB 1 from $421 million to $576 million—a $154 million increase. The increase consists of (1) $100 million for major maintenance contracts (specifically for bridges and culverts) and (2) $53.6 million to support 400 new positions. Of the new positions, 300 are to perform routine maintenance, while the remaining 100 are to oversee construction contracts for major maintenance. Additionally, the budget increases spending from the RMRA on highway rehabilitation projects included in the State Highway Operations and Protection Program (SHOPP) from $424 million to $994 million—a $570 million increase.
Capital Outlay Support. The budget increases spending from various funds on Caltrans’ capital outlay support program to deliver new projects through the SHOPP and other programs from $1.9 billion to $2 billion—a $168 million increase. The increase consists of (1) $137 million for 785 state staff and overtime equivalent positions, (2) $22 million for 87 external consultant equivalent positions, (3) $3.3 million for project permits, (4) $2 million (one time) for construction arbitration costs, (5) $1.2 million (one time) for a Caltrans’ facility needs study to be conducted by the Department of General Services, and (6) $1 million for training. Further, provisional language allows the Department of Finance (DOF) (after notification to the Joint Legislative Budget Committee [JLBC]) to increase or decrease spending for additional state staff or external consultants to meet project delivery needs. Under the language, DOF can increase spending by up to $36 million at any point in the fiscal year and can increase or decrease spending by up to $13.3 million on or after January 1, 2019.
Compensation Cost Adjustment. The budget provides a $58 million increase from the State Highway Account (SHA) to address what Caltrans characterizes as insufficient funding for its existing positions. The augmentation is spread across Caltrans’ programs based on their historical compensation expenditures and position history, with most of the increase going to highway maintenance ($20.5 million) and administration ($16.1 million). Caltrans indicates that this augmentation will alleviate the need for new position requests for most of its programs over the next few years.
Indirect Cost Recovery Rate Limit for Self‑Help Counties. When Caltrans performs work for a local government, it charges the local government for associated indirect costs, such as for accounting. The budget package includes trailer bill language to limit Caltrans to charging no more than 10 percent for administrative indirect cost recovery to self‑help counties (counties with sales tax measures dedicated to transportation improvements) until July 1, 2021. The budget provides Caltrans with $10 million (SHA) to fully make up for the resulting decrease in its indirect cost recovery revenues.
The budget provides $2.6 billion to fund CHP operations. This is an increase of $185 million, or 7.8 percent—mainly due to increases in funding for capital outlay projects—compared to the revised level of spending in 2017‑18. Nearly all of this funding is from the Motor Vehicle Account (MVA), which derives the majority of its revenue from vehicle registration fees and driver license fees.
Field Office Replacement Projects. The budget includes a total of $169 million from the MVA to fund replacement CHP offices. This total includes (1) $3.7 million for the performance criteria phase in Santa Fe Springs and Baldwin Park; and (2) $165 million for the design‑build phase in Quincy ($37 million), El Centro ($40 million), Hayward, ($48 million), and San Bernardino ($40 million). This funding is part of the administration’s ongoing plan to replace deficient CHP area offices.
Radio Console Replacement Project. The budget provides $3.9 million from the MVA in 2018‑19 to begin the replacement of the remaining antiquated dispatch consoles in all communication centers statewide over the next four years. The CHP estimates future expenditures from the MVA of $4.5 million in 2019‑20, $4.9 million in 2020‑21, and $509,000 in 2021‑22 in order to complete the replacement project.
Vehicle Fleet Replacement. The budget includes an ongoing augmentation of $4.5 million from the MVA for the replacement of CHP vehicles that exceed the Department of General Services’ recommended vehicle replacement mileage threshold of 100,000 miles. The CHP expects to replace a total of 1,105 vehicles in 2018‑19.
The budget provides $1.2 billion for DMV operations, an increase of $60 million (or 5 percent) from the revised level of 2017‑18 expenditures. Nearly all of this funding is from the MVA.
Driver License and Identification (ID) Card Processing. The 2018‑19 budget includes $351 million for DMV to process driver licenses and ID cards. This is an increase of $21 million from the 2017‑18 level due to workload related to the issuance of new driver licenses and ID cards that comply with federal standards—commonly referred to as “REAL IDs.” The budget authorizes the Director of Finance to further augment the level of funding for driver license and ID card processing by $16.6 million to alleviate customer wait times at DMV field offices, following a 30‑day notification to the JLBC. The Director of Finance is authorized to approve additional resources above $16.6 million to the extent DMV is able to justify the resources and provide an update on how the $16.6 million is to be used and its impact on wait times. (The Director of Finance has already authorized a total increase of $16.6 million and the Legislature has concurred with the request.)
Front‑End Sustainability (FES) Project. In 2013, the DMV initiated the FES project to complete the upgrade of its vehicle registration and fee collection system, which currently depend on 45‑year old technology. The budget package provides an increase of $15 million in 2018‑19 to support the implementation of the FES project. The budget package also includes trailer legislation to increase by $1 per‑transaction fee (from $3 to $4) charged to private entities (such as car dealerships) that utilize the system to collect vehicle registration fees on the department’s behalf, in order to help offset the project’s implementation costs. The FES project is expected to be completed in 2022‑23 at a total cost of $89 million, with the above fee increase expiring in 2023.
Field Office Replacement and Renovation Projects. The budget includes $7.9 million in 2018‑19 to continue the replacement and renovation of the Oxnard and Reedley DMV field offices, as well as to construct perimeter fencing at 13 existing field offices. The budget also includes $200,000 to begin advanced planning for two future renovation projects proposed for 2021‑22.
Other Budget Augmentations. The budget also includes (1) $3.1 million for the replacement of IT equipment that has reached the end of its useful life and (2) $1.4 million to extend the state’s clean air vehicle decal program as authorized by Chapter 630 of 2017 (AB 544, Bloom). This program permits certain low‑ and zero‑emission vehicles to operate in the state’s carpool lanes regardless of the vehicle’s occupancy level.