October 2, 2018
The budget package provides a total of $11.7 billion from various fund sources—the General Fund, bond funds, and various special funds—for programs administered by the California Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Agencies. This is a net decrease of about $3.5 billion (23 percent) compared to 2017‑18 estimated expenditures. This reduction primarily is related to a $2.6 billion decrease in the amount of bond funds budgeted. (We note that estimated bond expenditures for 2017‑18 are somewhat inflated because of how prior‑year bond appropriations are reflected in budget documents, making year‑over‑year comparisons of bond spending difficult.) Figures 20 and 21 display total funding provided for major departments overseen by the natural resources and environmental protection agencies, respectively.
Figure 20
Natural Resources Budget Summary
(Dollars in Millions)
Expenditures |
2016‑17 |
2017‑18 |
2018‑19 |
Change From 2017‑18 |
|
Amount |
Percent |
||||
Totals |
$5,039 |
$8,767 |
$7,212 |
‑$1,554 |
‑18% |
By Department |
|||||
Forestry and Fire Protection |
$1,305 |
$2,179 |
$1,844 |
‑$335 |
‑15% |
Parks and Recreation |
480 |
806 |
1,304 |
497 |
62 |
General obligation bond debt service |
1,025 |
951 |
1,026 |
76 |
8 |
Water Resources |
548 |
2,003 |
716 |
‑1,287 |
‑64 |
Energy Commission |
396 |
683 |
533 |
‑150 |
‑22 |
Fish and Wildlife |
431 |
520 |
524 |
4 |
1 |
Natural Resources Agency |
312 |
333 |
293 |
‑40 |
‑12 |
Wildlife Conservation Board |
94 |
496 |
196 |
‑300 |
‑60 |
Conservation Corps |
94 |
109 |
157 |
48 |
44 |
Conservation |
124 |
171 |
131 |
‑40 |
‑23 |
State Lands Commission |
32 |
45 |
99 |
54 |
119 |
Other resources programsa |
199 |
470 |
389 |
‑81 |
‑17 |
By Fund Source |
|||||
General Fund |
$2,726 |
$3,512 |
$3,622 |
$110 |
3% |
Special funds |
1,271 |
2,145 |
1,777 |
‑368 |
‑17 |
Bond funds |
885 |
2,740 |
1,521 |
‑1,219 |
‑44 |
Federal funds |
157 |
369 |
293 |
‑76 |
‑21 |
By Purpose |
|||||
State operations |
$4,174 |
$5,661 |
$4,913 |
‑$747 |
‑13% |
Local assistance |
556 |
2,146 |
1,734 |
‑412 |
‑19 |
Capital outlay |
309 |
960 |
566 |
‑394 |
‑41 |
aIncludes state conservancies, Coastal Commission, and other departments. |
Figure 21
Environmental Protection Budget Summary
(Dollars in Millions)
Expenditures |
2016‑17 |
2017‑18 |
2018‑19 |
Change From 2017‑18 |
|
Amount |
Percent |
||||
Totals |
$3,714 |
$6,436 |
$4,544 |
‑$1,893 |
‑29% |
By Department |
|||||
Resources Recycling and Recovery |
$1,500 |
$1,743 |
$1,568 |
‑$175 |
‑10% |
Air Resources Board |
700 |
1,705 |
1,386 |
‑319 |
‑19 |
Water Resources Control Board |
1,137 |
2,578 |
1,137 |
‑1,441 |
‑56 |
Toxic Substances Control |
247 |
263 |
303 |
40 |
15 |
Pesticide Regulation |
94 |
104 |
105 |
1 |
1 |
Other departmentsa |
37 |
44 |
44 |
1 |
2 |
By Fund Source |
|||||
General Fund |
$96 |
$217 |
$130 |
‑$88 |
‑40% |
Special funds |
2,905 |
4,286 |
3,842 |
‑443 |
‑10 |
Bond funds |
427 |
1,564 |
202 |
‑1,362 |
‑87 |
Federal funds |
286 |
370 |
370 |
— |
— |
By Purpose |
|||||
State operations |
$1,247 |
$1,753 |
$1,638 |
‑$115 |
‑7% |
Local assistance |
2,467 |
4,530 |
2,906 |
‑1,624 |
‑36 |
Capital outlay |
— |
154 |
— |
‑154 |
|
aIncludes the Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, and general obligation bond debt service. |
State cap‑and‑trade auction revenue is deposited in the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund (GGRF). As shown in Figure 22, the spending plan allocates $3.1 billion from the GGRF for various programs. This plan includes: (1) $1.5 billion in continuous appropriations, (2) $166 million in other existing spending commitments, and (3) $1.4 billion in discretionary spending. The plan assumes at least $2.6 billion in auction revenue in ٢٠١٨‑19, more than $400 million carried over from the end of 2017‑18, and $50 million in interest income accrued to the fund. We discuss the major parts of this expenditure plan in more detail below.
Figure 22
2018‑19 Cap‑and‑Trade Expenditure Plan
(In Millions)
Program |
Department |
Amount |
Continuous Appropriationsa |
$1,490 |
|
High‑speed rail |
High‑Speed Rail Authority |
$621 |
Affordable housing and sustainable communities |
Strategic Growth Council |
497 |
Transit and intercity rail capital |
Transportation Agency |
248 |
Transit operations |
Caltrans |
124 |
Other Existing Spending Commitments |
$166 |
|
Manufacturing sales tax exemption backfill |
N/A |
$89 |
State administrative costs |
Various |
49 |
SRA fee backfill |
CalFire/Conservation Corps |
28 |
Discretionary Spending |
$1,401 |
|
Mobile Source Emissions |
||
Heavy duty vehicle and off‑road equipment programs |
Air Resources Board |
$180 |
Clean Vehicle Rebate Project |
Air Resources Board |
175 |
Low‑income light duty vehicles and school buses |
Air Resources Board |
100 |
Low‑carbon fuel production |
Energy Commission |
13 |
Local Air Pollution Reduction |
||
Local air district programs to reduce air pollution |
Air Resources Board |
245 |
Local air district administrative costs |
Air Resources Board |
20 |
Technical assistance to community groups |
Air Resources Board |
10 |
Agriculture |
||
Agricultural diesel engine replacements |
Air Resources Board |
112 |
Methane reductions from dairies |
Food and Agriculture |
99 |
Incentives for food processors |
Energy Commission |
64 |
Healthy Soils |
Food and Agriculture |
5 |
Agricultural renewable energy |
Energy Commission |
4 |
Forestry |
||
Forest health and fire prevention |
CalFire |
160 |
Prescribed fire and fuel reduction |
CalFire |
30 |
Local fire response |
Office of Emergency Services |
25 |
Regional forest restoration projects |
Natural Resources Agency |
20 |
Urban forestry |
CalFire |
5 |
Other programs |
||
Transformative Climate Communities |
Strategic Growth Council |
40 |
Waste diversion |
CalRecycle |
25 |
Urban greening |
Natural Resources Agency |
20 |
Climate and energy research |
Strategic Growth Council |
18 |
Low‑income weatherization |
Community Services and Development |
10 |
Energy Corps |
Conservation Corps |
6 |
Wetland restoration |
Fish and Wildlife |
5 |
Coastal adaptation |
Various |
5 |
Woodstove replacements |
Air Resources Board |
3 |
Technical assistance for disadvantaged communities |
Strategic Growth Council |
2 |
Total |
$3,056 |
|
aContinuous appropriations based on revenue assumption of $2.6 billion in 2018‑19. CalTrans = California Department of Transportation; SRA = State Responsibility Area; CalFire = California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection; and CalRecyle = California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery. |
Continuous Appropriations ($1.5 Billion). Under legislation passed in 2014, about 60 percent of annual auction revenue (less certain other existing spending commitments) is continuously appropriated to high‑speed rail (25 percent), affordable housing and sustainable communities (20 percent), transit and intercity rail capital (10 percent), and low carbon transit operations (5 percent).
Other Existing Spending Commitments ($166 Million). The spending plan includes $166 million for spending commitments made in prior years. Similar to the current year, some of these allocations—specifically backfilling the State Responsibility Area (SRA) fee suspension ($28 million) and the expanded manufacturing sales tax exemption ($89 million)—are “taken off the top” before determining continuous appropriations.
Discretionary Spending ($1.4 Billion). Revenue that is not continuously appropriated—sometimes referred to as discretionary revenue—is available to be allocated through the annual budget act or other legislation. The budget includes $1.4 billion in discretionary GGRF spending for various programs. Most of the programs received GGRF in prior years as well. Some of the notable changes to the allocations in 2018‑19 include:
Multiyear Commitments for Certain Programs. Most of the new spending is one time, but some programs would receive multiyear funding. These multiyear programs are: (1) $200 million annually over eight years to continue light‑duty ZEV rebates, including $175 million for the Clean Vehicle Rebate Project and $25 million for incentives for light‑duty vehicles for low‑income consumers; (2) $30 million ongoing for prescribed fire and fuel reduction; (3) the two‑year $20 million allocation for AB 617 implementation; and (4) $6 million ongoing to the California Conservation Corps for energy efficiency activities in the Energy Corps program. In addition, Chapter 626 of 2018 (SB 901, Dodd) directs $200 million annually from 2019‑20 through 2023‑24 to forest health, prescribed fire, and fuel reduction projects.
Strategy to Ensure Fund Solvency. The budget prohibits most departments and agencies from spending more than 75 percent of their GGRF allocations before the final quarterly auction of the fiscal year (scheduled for May 2019). Once the final auction is complete and the total amount of 2018‑19 revenue is determined, the Department of Finance (DOF) will determine how much of the revenue is available to fund the discretionary programs specified in the expenditure plan. DOF must then notify the Joint Legislative Budget Committee of its determination within 30 days. This strategy is meant to ensure fund solvency if actual revenue is lower than $2.6 billion. Certain programs—most notably $200 million to CARB for light‑duty ZEV rebates—are not be subject to the 75 percent restriction.
California voters approved Proposition 68 in June 2018. This measure authorizes the state to sell a total of $4.1 billion in general obligation bonds for resources‑related purposes, including parks, habitat restoration, and water projects. The 2018‑19 Budget Act appropriates over one‑quarter of the bond. Specifically, this includes $1.3 billion for 20 departments. Figure 23 shows expenditures for each department and program proposed for Proposition 68 funding in 2018‑19.
Figure 23
2018‑19 Funding From Proposition 68 Resources Bond
(In Millions)
Department |
Primary Uses |
Amount |
Parks and Recreation |
Local and state parks |
$482.6 |
Water Resources Control Board |
Groundwater cleanup and management, safe drinking water |
177.3 |
Water Resources |
Flood protection, groundwater recharge |
160.8 |
Natural Resources Agency |
Salton Sea, river and parkway recreation, green infrastructure |
126.2 |
Wildlife Conservation Board |
Habitat conservation |
71.9 |
Coastal Conservancy |
San Francisco Bay restoration, coastal forests |
53.7 |
Sierra Nevada Conservancy |
Watershed Improvement Program, habitat restoration |
36.3 |
Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy |
Habitat restoration, LA River restoration |
34.0 |
Food and Agriculture |
Water efficiency, healthy soils |
31.0 |
Fish and Wildlife |
River and wetland restoration |
23.6 |
Ocean Protection Council |
Marine wildlife, assisting coastal communities |
20.3 |
Forestry and Fire Protection |
Urban forestry |
14.6 |
Conservation Corps |
Parkway restoration, grants to local corps |
9.8 |
San Gabriel Mountains and LA River Conservancy |
LA River restoration |
8.7 |
Tahoe Conservancy |
Upper Truckee River and Marsh restoration |
3.2 |
Conservation |
Agricultural conservation |
2.2 |
Baldwin Hills Conservancy |
Habitat restoration |
1.2 |
Sacramento‑San Joaquin Delta Conservancy |
Economic development |
1.1 |
Coachella Valley Mountains Conservancy |
Habitat restoration |
0.2 |
San Diego River Conservancy |
San Diego River restoration |
0.1 |
Various |
Statewide bond administration |
1.4 |
Total |
$1,260.0 |
|
LA = Los Angeles. |
The Environmental License Plate Fund (ELPF) supports various resources and environmental protection programs. The fund is primarily supported from the sale and renewal of personalized motor vehicle license plates, as well as a portion of fees on the sale and renewal of certain specialty license plates. The Department of Motor Vehicles recently began offering “legacy license plates,” which has increased revenues in recent years. The fund is estimated to receive $55 million in revenues in 2018‑19. As displayed in Figure 24, the budget includes several new ELPF expenditures. Most of this funding is provided on a one‑time or limited‑term basis.
Figure 24
Major New ELPF Expenditures in the 2018‑19 Budget
(In Millions)
Department |
Purpose |
Amount |
CNRA |
Ocean Resiliency Program to address threats of climate change on coastal and marine ecosystems |
$15.0 |
TRPA/SWRCB |
Backfill General Fund monies redirected to DFW |
6.6 |
CalFire |
Fireworks stewardship program for seized illegal fireworks |
3.6 |
SLC |
Boca Chica Lowlands Restoration Project |
2.0 |
Delta Stewardship Council |
Delta Science Program |
2.0 |
General Services |
Backfill Energy Resources Programs Account funding |
1.9 |
Conservation |
Watershed coordinator grants |
1.8 |
Coastal Conservancy |
Backfill bond funds for ongoing operations |
1.0 |
CNRA |
Establish project monitoring unit |
0.7 |
ELPF = Environmental License Plate Fund; CNRA = California Natural Resources Agency; TRPA = Tahoe Regional Planning Agency; SWRCB = State Water Resources Control Board; DFW = Department of Fish and Wildlife; CalFire = California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection; SLC = State Lands Commission; and DWR = Department of Water Resources. |
The budget includes $524 million from various sources for DFW. This is roughly equivalent to the amount provided in 2017‑18.
Funding Augmentations. The budget provides $39.1 million ($34.1 million General Fund and $5 million Tire Recycling Management Fund) in augmentations for DFW. Of this amount, $29.6 million is authorized for three years and $9.5 million is provided on a one‑time basis. The new funding is provided for the following purposes:
The budget provides $533 million for CEC in 2018‑19, a net decrease of $150 million (22 percent) compared to estimated prior‑year expenditures. The net decrease largely reflects a technical issue related to unspent 2016‑17 funds that were carried over into 2017‑18. This decrease is partially offset by an increase in spending for ZEV fueling infrastructure, discussed below.
ZEV Fueling Infrastructure. The budget includes $134.5 million ARFVTF for ZEV fueling infrastructure, including $114.5 million for electric vehicle charging stations and $20 million for hydrogen fueling stations. These funds will be administered through the existing Alternative and Renewable Fuel and Vehicle Technology Program (ARFVTP). The $114.5 million for electric vehicle charging stations is $99 million more than the 2017‑18 funding level. This increase reflects (1) a $43 million one‑time allocation from the ARFVTF fund balance, (2) a $15 million one‑time transfer from the Air Quality Improvement Fund, and (3) redirecting $41 million from other ARFVTP activities, such as grants for low‑carbon fuel production facilities. (As discussed earlier in the cap‑and‑trade section of this report, $12.5 million GGRF is being used to backfill a portion of funding for low‑carbon fuel production.) The administration intends to allocate all ARFVTP funding (about $95 million annually) to ZEV fueling infrastructure over the next several years.
The budget includes $716 million for DWR, which represents a $1.3 billion decrease compared to the prior year. (These totals do not include the roughly $1.7 billion in annual payments from water contractors for DWR’s work on the State Water Project, as those funds are not appropriated through the annual budget act.) This year‑to‑year decrease is primarily due to the way bond funds are accounted for in the annual budget. Specifically, DWR had $1.7 billion in 2017‑18 spending authority from bond funds appropriated over the past several years, compared to the roughly $350 million appropriated in the 2018‑19 Budget Act.
Flood Management. The budget provides $195 million from the General Fund for flood management projects—primarily levee improvements—in the Central Valley. This funding falls into two categories:
In addition to these funds, the budget includes $96.5 million for various flood management activities from Proposition 68 (as mentioned earlier) and $100 million from the General Fund to address deferred maintenance and repairs on levees in the Central Valley (described in the “Other Provisions” section of this report).
The budget includes $1.8 billion from various fund sources to support the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CalFire), a net decrease of $335 million, or 15 percent, from the estimated 2017‑18 level. This decrease is primarily due additional one‑time fire‑fighting costs provided in 2017‑18, particularly for the large fires that occurred in Sonoma and Napa Counties in October 2017 and in Ventura County in December 2017.
Helicopter Fleet Replacement. The budget includes $101 million from the General Fund in 2018‑19 for the procurement of four new helicopters as part of CalFire’s helicopter fleet replacement plan. Funding for procurement of the first helicopter was provided in the 2017‑18 budget. Under the plan, all 12 of CalFire’s helicopters would be replaced by 2020‑21. The one‑time cost of fleet replacement, including ancillary costs and capital outlay, is currently estimated at $315 million. The administration estimates ongoing support costs will grow to about $14 million annually for increased staffing and maintenance needs.
Fire Protection. The budget provides an increase of about $50 million from the General Fund to support CalFire’s firefighting capabilities. This includes $11 million for increased staffing and vehicle maintenance, $9.4 million for additional dispatchers at Emergency Command Centers, $7.3 million for additional California Conservation Corps (CCC) fire crews, and $4 million to lengthen the season that McClellan Reload Air Base is staffed. (The budget also provides funding for a new firefighter training program for parolees at the Ventura Training Center, which is discussed in the “Judiciary and Criminal Justice” section of this report.)
The budget includes a total of about $157 million ($90 million General Fund) for CCC, a net increase of about $48 million, or 44 percent, above estimated 2017‑18 expenditures. This year‑over‑year change primarily reflects an increase of almost $36 million in General Fund spending for capital outlay projects. These projects mainly consist of $24 million for the planning and construction costs of a kitchen, multipurpose room, and dorm replacement at the Auburn residential center, as well as funding for the acquisition and planning phase to build new residential centers (as discussed below).
Expansion and Replacement of Residential Center Facilities. The budget includes $9 million from the General Fund for the acquisition and planning phases of new residential centers in Auberry ($4.3 million), Los Pinos ($1.4 million), and Greenwood ($3.2 million), as well as the study phase in Yountville ($200,000). This funding begins the implementation of a major expansion of residential centers over the next five years. The first two of these facilities will provide services in new locations. The center at Greenwood will replace an existing residential center that is no longer serviceable, and the new center at Yountville will replace an existing nonresidential center in Napa. The projects are estimated to cost a combined total of $163 million (General Fund and lease revenue bonds) to complete.
The budget includes $1.3 billion from various fund sources to support DPR, a net increase of $497 million, or 62 percent, from the estimated 2017‑18 level. This is primarily due to $483 in one‑time Proposition 68 funding (discussed above).
Parks Funding Augmentation. The budget assumes that $79 million of fuel tax revenue will be transferred to the State Parks and Recreation Fund (SPRF) in 2018‑19 as a result of Chapter 5 of 2017 (SB 1, Beall). This is an increase of $25 million from the amount transferred in 2017‑18, which primarily reflects the full implementation of the fuel tax increases established in SB 1. Of the transferred amount, the budget provides (1) $26.6 million to address a historical budget shortfall in SPRF and $7.7 million to build up the fund’s year‑end reserve; (2) $3 million to continue support that was initiated in 2017‑18 for recruitment and training, off‑highway vehicle grants, and abandoned watercraft abatement grants; and (3) $41.9 million ongoing and 361 positions to expand service levels throughout the state park system. The department utilized its newly implemented accounting system—known as Service‑Based Budgeting or SBB—to inform its proposed allocation of additional resources and positions across the state parks. The largest funding increases are for facilities and maintenance, natural resource management, and local engagement.
California Indian Heritage Center. The budget authorizes $200 million—$100 million from the General Fund and up to $100 million in donations—for the planning and construction of a California Indian Heritage Center in West Sacramento. The center is intended to replace the State Indian Museum at Sutter’s Fort State Historic Park in Sacramento. The new center would be managed by the department in collaboration with tribal representatives. The final project is expected to include up to 120,000 square feet of building space, outdoor plazas and venues, and educational trails to the Sacramento River. It is expected to be completed by the end of 2022.
The budget provides $99 million for SLC, which is more than double the current‑year level of $45 million. The significant funding increase is to plug offshore oil and gas wells, as described below.
Abandoned Oil and Gas Wells. The budget provides $58 million in 2018‑19 for SLC to plug and secure two offshore oil and gas sites near Santa Barbara. Specifically, the budget provides $38 million for Platform Holly and $20 million for Rincon Island as proposed by the administration. Under the administration’s plan, $20 million would be provided for each site in 2019‑20, and an additional $10.5 million for Rincon Island in 2020‑21. SLC assumed control and responsibility for the facilities at these sites after the lessees declared fiscal insolvency and relinquished the leases they had held with the state. These wells and facilities are on state lands and will continue to pose risks to the environment and public health until they are fully plugged and secured. The ultimate cost to the state is likely to be less than the $109 million that the Legislature approved, however, as the state is in active negotiations for a prior lessee to pay some of the costs. Any funds that the state ultimately receives will reimburse the General Fund for these upfront appropriations. The Legislature also approved supplemental reporting language requiring SLC to submit a status update regarding funding, work, costs, and the terms of other offshore leases by January 10, 2019.
The budget includes a total of about $1.1 billion ($72 million General Fund) for SWRCB in 2018‑19. This is a net reduction of $1.4 billion, or 56 percent, below 2017‑18 expenditures. The decrease is due mainly to an almost $1.5 billion reduction in bond funding from Proposition 1 (2014).
Safe Drinking Water. As part of the January 10 budget package, the administration proposed budget trailer legislation to impose new charges on water system customers and certain agricultural entities. The revenues, in turn, would have been used to implement a financial assistance program to address unsafe drinking water. The Legislature did not adopt the Governor’s proposal. However, the Legislature approved $20 million from the General Fund on a one‑time basis for SWRCB, mainly to ensure safe drinking water in schools and provide emergency relief grants to households. (The budget also includes $3.5 million from the General Fund for the Office of Emergency Services to provide emergency water tanks.)