Sequestering Savings From the Closure of Developmental Centers

Jan 31, 2018 - For example, the City of Costa Mesa has zoned a portion of Fairview DC property as open space and other portions for single ‑family residential development, public facilities, or recreational uses. (If the land is not sold, but instead transferred to another state department, it would not be subject to local zoning rules.)
https://lao.ca.gov/Publications/Report/3735

Fiscal Outlook: Developmental Services

Nov 15, 2017 - If the state chooses to transfer one or more of the properties to another state agency, it would not generate any revenue. Because the nature of the disposition and potential repurposing of DC properties is yet to be determined, we have not projected any offsetting revenue gains.
https://lao.ca.gov/Publications/Report/3717

The 2017-18 Budget: Analysis of the Human Services Budget

Feb 28, 2017 - Finally, the state may transfer a portion of the TANF block grant funds received each year to certain other federal block grants, such as the Title XX Social Services Block Grant, to be expended according to the rules of the block grant receiving the transfer.
https://lao.ca.gov/Publications/Report/3576/1

The 2016-17 Budget: Analysis of the Human Services Budget

Feb 11, 2016 - The 2011 realignment transferred fiscal risk to counties at the same time as it gave them a guaranteed source of revenues. Prospectively, counties are not responsible for future cost increases resulting from state, federal, and judicial policy changes, but are responsible for all other increases —for example, those associated with rising caseloads.
https://lao.ca.gov/Publications/Report/3351

Health and Social Services Block Grant Not A Good Fit for Counties [Publication Details]

Feb 18, 2004 - the Governor proposes to consolidate into a single block grant, funding for state-only programs which serve immigrants, and transfer these programs to the counties effective October 1, 2004. The proposal assumes that counties will achieve administrative efficiencies, so proposed block grant funding has been reduced by 5 percent.
https://lao.ca.gov/Publications/Detail/1117

Realignment Revisited: An Evaluation of the 1991 Experiment In State-County Relations [Publication Details]

Feb 6, 2001 - Realignment, enacted in 1991, transferred various mental health, health, and social services programs from the state to county control. It also altered program cost-sharing ratios, and provided counties with dedicated tax revenues to pay for these changes.
https://lao.ca.gov/Publications/Detail/755

The Child Support Enforcement Program From a Fiscal Perspective: How Can Performance Be Improved? [Publication Details]

Apr 13, 1999 - [Publication Details] Description: We review the program and recommend that either (1) responsibility for administering and funding the program be transferred from the counties to the state, or (2) administrative responsibilities be retained by counties coupled with a new fiscal incentive program.
https://lao.ca.gov/Publications/Detail/306

The Governor's 1995-96 State-County Realignment Proposal [Publication Details]

Mar 1, 1995 - The 1995-96 Governor's Budget includes a realignment proposal which would increase county funding responsibility for the Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) Program and for several children's services programs.
https://lao.ca.gov/Publications/Detail/3074

California's Child Support Enforcement Program [Publication Details]

Jan 22, 1992 - The child support enforcement program could be improved by changing the existing set of incentives that affect decision making on program funding. To accomplish this, we present two options for the Legislature. Under the first option, the responsibility for administration and funding of the program would be transferred from the counties to the state.
https://lao.ca.gov/Publications/Detail/550